Translate this page

Monday, October 20, 2014

My online story.



As some of you may know I am writing an online science fiction (speculative fiction) story via my blogs.

What has been interesting to watch are how the stats report activity. I have only been able to use Google stats, which I am afraid aren't very accurate. There are reports about Google stats that indicate it is accurate, and others stating it is in-accurate, and for various reasons in both directions.

As I write this I have just had lunch and during lunch had a discussion with some people  who I am a great deal older than, but the comment was made that one person thought he was speaking to someone his own age about email.

We somewhat concluded that there is a trend away from email. Smart phone technology allows for texting, so why bother opening an email client anyway?

Which is counter to a recent marketing report I read about a month ago indicating that advertising via email is becoming, once again, a viable method.

I mention this as I am getting ready to conclude the 2nd part of my online story called Spark Gap.

And what I am noticing is that my stats are now starting to go down on this storyline, but up on the storyline that is the third part called The Battles.

I am not sure what to make of this. My thoughts go around the idea that everyone has figured out how SPARK GAP is going to end, and are either losing interest and moving on to the third part, The Battles, or the story is altogether boring and readers are simply becoming disinterested, so they are stopping reading.

And I have asked for feedback, but I am not getting any.

And I can't help wondering if the "mystique" and interest of the internet is beginning to ebb, and so telling a story online is a moot endeavor.

Oh yes, one more thing. As I look onto the world stage at the moment and see the turmoil around the world, from the Middle East to our own borders here in the US, the thought strikes me that we love to hate.

We hate each other for our differences, we hate each other for having what others don't and wanting it for ourselves, we hate each other and go to battle over it.

I watched the Enders Game movie this summer. An interesting story that essentially concludes with the defeat of the enemy aliens. And then hypothesizes, or correctly states that, once you defeat your enemy you love them. The hero goes to the leader of the enemy and makes a commitment to continue their race after having defeated them. It didn't do very well at the box office as I recall, not great but not bad either.

The idea though seems to hold true. From boys getting into fights on playgrounds, and then walking away friends, to unjust bosses in the work place.

I think I made a mistake earlier this year when my boss and I locked horns. This is taken out of context so the framework of why what happened is missing. From a psychological standpoint I am making an effort to reward via the concept of positive re-enforcement, as opposed to negative re-enforcement.

My boss and I got into argument after argument. In the end he left the company (not because of me but because a kobayashi maru situation was created, for those of you that don't know what the kobayashi maru is, it is reference to a Star Trek concept, that of the no win situation, Captain Kirk didn't believe in it), and a few months later I was asked to resign because of other issues at hand. In hindsight I probably should have seen the writing on the wall at that point and vacated the company as well. I had never been in that situation, so I didn't see it.

The psychology seems to hold though, get into a fight, and then you both walk away as friends.

After numerous conflicts with my boss, I ended up buying him one of these small remote control helicopters. After I had given it to him, I realized I had done exactly what I didn't want to do, I had rewarded negative re-enforcement. In hindsight that really bothers me.

I have been purposefully trying to not write into my online story conflict in such a way as to create a fight. Time and again critics of story telling talk about the glorification of war.

In my cinema studies class the conclusion was drawn at one point that if you don't have conflict, you don't have a story. And that war is the ultimate drama and story line.

I find then the Japanese outlook on telling stories worth a look. For a long time when the internet was getting started and the early efforts to put video onto the net were occurring, I watched AZN TV streaming internet video, AZN TV broadcast Japanese and Chinese storylines. The Japanese storyline quite often had endings I thought were unusual. No victor, Or perhaps the bad guys won. Or no conclusion, the story simply stops. Anything but the morality plays we entertain here in the US, and anyone subscribing to western style entertainment.

And recently I read about how Norway and the Netherlands in general, will watch hours long broadcasts of real video of barges moving up and down waterways, or something being built. In real time, not the typical US condensed version of time we are so readily used to.

When I started on the net it was clear to me that most, if not all, video will end up on the net. So I started my own streaming video site in 1996. And I concluded we have before us a whole new medium, we can do it in any way we want. And I started to post video that was uninterupted by commercial advertising, and was anything but the 23 minute (half hour broadcast), 54 minute (1 hour broadcast), etc..., that is typical for American broadcasting.



No comments:

Post a Comment